World
Trade Center Case Study
In
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center
horrified the civilized world. An estimated 2,830 human lives
were extinguished by these attacks-the second greatest number
of lives ever lost in a single event in the United States. These
attacks also resulted in extensive damage to a large number of
buildings at the World Trade Center complex and within the vicinity
of the complex. In the aftermath of the events, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) and the Structural Engineering Institute
of the American Society of Civil Engineers (SEI/ASCE)-in association
with several other federal agencies and professional organizations-dispatched
a team of civil, structural, and fire protection engineers to
study the performance of the buildings at the site.
The BPAT was to review the damage caused
by these events, collect available data, develop understanding
of the performance of each affected building, determine the causes
of observed behavior, and reveal the need for any further studies
that should be performed. In particular, the team studied the
immediate effects of the aircraft impact on each tower, the spread
of fire following the crashes, the reduction in structural strength
caused by the fire, and the mechanism that led to the collapse
of each tower.
The
first aircraft struck WTC 1 roughly between the 94th and 98th
floors, inflicting extensive damage to the north face of the tower
in this area. At least five of the prefabricated, three-column
sections that formed the exterior walls broke off in the area
where the airplane fuselage and engines impacted, and parts of
these sections were thrust inside the building envelope by the
impact. Floors locally supported by these exterior wall sections
appeared to partially collapse, losing their support along the
exterior wall. In areas struck by the outer wing structures, the
exterior columns fractured upon impact. Subsequent interpretation
of photographic evidence will suggest that between 31 and 36 columns
on the north facade were destroyed over portions of a four-story
area and that a partial collapse of floors in this area appears
to have occurred over a horizontal length of wall of approximating
65 ft; floors in other portions of the building will appear to
have remained intact.
The
second aircraft struck the eastern half of the south face of WTC
2 approximately between the 78th and 84th floors. Massive damage
was inflicted on the south face of the building in the zone of
impact. Within the central zone of impact, where the airplane
fuselage and engines struck, six of the prefabricated, three-column
sections that formed the exterior walls were broken loose of the
structure, and some of the building elements were apparently thrust
inside the building envelope. As in the impact of the plane on
WTC 1, the floors supported by these exterior wall sections appear
to have partially collapsed, losing their support along the exterior
wall. In the areas impacted by the outer wing structures, the
exterior steel columns were fractured on impact. Photographic
evidence will subsequently suggest that between 27 and 32 columns
along the south building face were destroyed over portions of
a five-story range. Partial collapse of floors in this zone appears
to have occurred over a horizontal length of wall of approximately
70 ft; floors in other portions of the building appear to have
remained intact. It is probable that the columns in the southwest
corner of the core also experienced some damage because they would
have been in the direct path of the fuselage and port engine.
Each
of the fireballs expanded to its maximum diameter within about
two seconds as the expelled fuel dispersed and flames traveled
through the resulting fuel/air mixture. If an explosion or detonation
had occurred, this expansion would have taken place in microseconds.
Preliminary calculations suggest that the resulting overpressures
were less than 1 lb per square inch (PSI). Although this pressure
was sufficient to extensively break windows on the affected floors,
it should not have resulted in significant structural damage.
Collapse
of the twin towers astonished most observers, including many knowledgeable
structural engineers. These were structures notable for their
robust, redundant framing systems. Many believed that their structural
anatomy would have enabled them to withstand the attacks. The
twin towers of the World Trade Center were the primary components
of the seven-building World Trade Center complex, and although
they were similar, they were not identical. Each of the towers
encompassed 110 stories above grade and 6 levels below. WTC 1
had a roof height of 1,368 ft; WTC 2 was nearly as tall, with
a roof height of 1,362 ft. WTC 1 also supported a 360 ft tall
television and radio transmission tower. Each building had a square
floor plat 207 ft 2 in. long on a side. Corners were chamfered
6 feet 11 in. Nearly 1 acre of floor space was provided at each
level. A rectangular service core with overall dimensions of approximately
87 by 137 ft was present at the center of each building, housing
three exit stairways, 99 elevators, and 16 escalators.
The service core in WTC 1 was oriented east to west; the core
in WTC 2 was oriented north to south. In addition to these basic
differences in configuration, the presence of each building affected
the wind loading on the other structure, resulting in a somewhat
different distribution of design wind pressures and, therefore,
somewhat different structural design of the lateral-force-resisting
system. In addition, tenant improvements over the years resulted
in the removal of portions of floors and the placement of new,
private stairways between floors, in a somewhat random pattern.
The
features in question include the following:
1.Steel floor trusses used as the primary
horizontal framing elements for floor systems outside the structural
core and their structural robustness and redundancy compared with
other construction;
2.Gypsum-board-sheathed walls in stairwells and shafts for impact
resistance and as vertical fire separation between building floors;
3.Spray-applied fire protection materials on steel framing and
the adequacy of these materials to provide protection for the
steel frame;
4.Emergency egress stairways grouped in the central building core,
as opposed to being dispersed throughout the structure.
The
most important factors which effected to the WTC debris are as
following :-
1. The towers' ability to withstand additional loading and have
increased the susceptibility of the structures to fire-induced
failure. It is likely that the force of the impact and the speed
with which debris traveled through the structures compromised
the sprayed
2. The advancing fires elevate the temperature within the tower.
Future estimates will place it between 1,700? and 2,000?F-further
stressing the structure.
3. Damage inflicted by the impacts and the rapid movement of debris
through the impacted floors has most likely impaired the sprinkler
and fire standpipe systems
4.
As the fires rage throughout the upper reaches of both towers,
the evacuation of the structures progresses as successfully as
thought possible given the nature of these incidents. Several
building features will be identified as key to the towers' ability
to remain standing for as long as they did, enabling most of the
buildings' occupants to escape. These include the robustness and
redundancy of the steel framing system, the presence of adequate
egress stairways that are well marked and lighted, and the rigorous
emergency egress training programs provided for building tenants.
It will ultimately be determined that 99 percent of the occupants
of the floors below the areas of impact survived, largely because
the stairways at these levels remained intact and passable. Tragically,
those occupying floors within and above the impact areas cannot
escape because the stairways in the impact areas have been destroyed.
The high percentage of those able to escape may also be attributed-at
least in part-to the fact that some physical changes and training
programs were put in place following the 1993 bombing of WTC 1.
These physical modifications included the placement of photoluminescent
paint on the egress paths to assist occupants during egress and
the installation of emergency lighting in the stairways. Additionally,
some of the occupants of WTC 2 vacate that tower upon learning
of the crash of the first plane into WTC 1. The world would later
learn the devastating news that a number of survivors who had
occupied WTC 2 reported that a message was broadcast over the
building's loudspeaker system indicating that WTC 2 was secure
and that occupants should return to their offices. While many
people did not heed this announcement, there were those who did.
The decision would cost them their lives.
Preliminary analyses of the damaged
structures, together with the fact that the structures remained
standing for an extended period of time, suggest that absent severe
loading events, such as a windstorm or earthquake, the buildings
could have remained standing in their damaged states indefinitely.
However, the structures were subjected to a severe loading event
in the form of the fires caused by the aircraft impacts.
|